Pro V1 392

RE: Pro V1 392

BCandee — Tue, 15 Oct 2019 02:01:54 GMT

I had no idea they went back to 1999! What an amazing ball.

RE: Pro V1 392

pulplvr — Tue, 08 Oct 2019 20:50:53 GMT

[quote user="David T"]

here is up through 2014

[/quote]

In addition to the eight shown here, there are there more: 2015, 2017, and 2019. That makes eleven versions so far. (I don't have a current ProV1, so I substituted a ProV1x.)www.titleist.com/.../ppljlspz8gedxu0ka9l8

RE: Pro V1 392

Carl B — Tue, 08 Oct 2019 19:53:29 GMT

How many versions of pro v1 and v1x have there been?

RE: Pro V1 392

Elijah P — Mon, 07 Oct 2019 18:00:09 GMT

I prefer the 392's. The Pro V1's from 2003-2005 are the best balls I have ever used. They felt great and were practically indestructible (a urethane ball that didn't scuff).

I switched to cally balls in 2008 and remained a cally user until 2019. I just switched back to Titleist (Pro V1's-- definitely prefer the Made In USA ones). I am kicking myself for not switching back sooner.

I actually loved the packaging on the 2001-2005 Pro v1's (the light orangish color on the silver box). This may sound weird, but seeing the light (or sun) reflect off that peachish-orange and silver box looked awesome. Coolest looking box ever. I used to (and still do) buy balls from a Golf Etc about 45 minutes from me (closest retailer to me). the owner lets me buy a dozen balls ina single number (all 3's for me).

RE: Pro V1 392

Vic B — Mon, 12 Aug 2019 19:21:29 GMT

I found one of the "392" balls in pristine condition by a cart path last week and decided to hit it for a few holes. I would say it has a firmer feel than contemporary V1 and V1x balls, but very close in distance when the ball is hit solid. It felt surprisingly good and neither too mushy or like a rock. Since I made a birdie with it, I think I'll put it in my golf ball Hall of Fame...:)

RE: Pro V1 392

Jae C — Wed, 01 Nov 2017 20:04:14 GMT

Can anyone from Titleist or someone with expertise comment on how the performance characteristics have changed over the years? Softness/hardness/compression, spin rate with driver/woods vs wedges/short irons, etc. Marketing always claims the latest models are "better" but I have only read about claims of "more consistent performance" and "more durable cover".

Re: Pro V1 392

Kirk E — Wed, 13 Jan 2016 01:58:01 GMT

Thanks for that. Cool to see the progression over the years.

Re: Pro V1 392

Edward K — Thu, 31 Dec 2015 13:51:46 GMT

I still have several dozen of the Professional 100's, and they still fly very well. Within a few yards, I'd say, and they are 20+ years old. I break one out occasionally, whenever the question pops up......

Re: Pro V1 392

Bob T — Thu, 24 Dec 2015 01:36:21 GMT

I have prov1s in separated boxes back to 2006 and they go as good as I can hit them and I've turned out good rounds. After saying that, in tournaments I break out a fresh new prov1 because in my mind I want the best I can get!!!

Re: Pro V1 392

Stewart T — Wed, 23 Dec 2015 07:07:10 GMT

Just curious, how long can we keep golf balls to maintain its usefulness.

Re: Pro V1 392

Chris M — Tue, 22 Dec 2015 18:55:38 GMT

[quote user="David T"]

here is up through 2014

[/quote]

Real cool picture David!

Need to find a ball from 1999 too keep aside and start a collection

Re: Pro V1 392

David T — Mon, 02 Nov 2015 18:02:38 GMT

here is up through 2014

Re: Pro V1 392

Dan H — Thu, 29 Oct 2015 03:00:50 GMT

Very cool picture Christian!!

Re: Pro V1 392

Richard M — Thu, 22 Oct 2015 00:59:41 GMT

I note the photos cover only up to 2009. Does anyone have photos to show each generation up to the present?

Re: Pro V1 392

Richard M — Wed, 21 Oct 2015 22:50:54 GMT

I like the photo attached which shows the various arrow markings on each generation of ball. I note it goes only up to 2009. Can anyone update it to show all models up to date?

Re: Pro V1 392

Tom K — Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:26:57 GMT

No they are not the same ball the 392 is a little harder then the pro1 itself. I will play the 392s but I see a big deference in the two balls.

Re : Christian J replied to Re: Pro V1 392

Francisco Z — Fri, 01 Mar 2013 23:51:57 GMT

Thanks

Le 01/03/13, Christian J <bounce-christianj3@acushnetgolf.com> a écrit :

Christian J replied to Re: Pro V1 392 in Golf Balls.

Here's a good timeline of the stages of the ProV1.

You were sent this email because you opted to receive email notifications when someone responded to this forum thread.

View and reply online or reply to this email.

To unsubscribe from this thread, disable notifications here.

The information transmitted is intended only for the
person or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use
of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this
information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this
in error, please delete the material from any
computer.

--
Francisco Zangao
Gardez les yeux sur la balle...

Re: Pro V1 392

Christian J — Fri, 01 Mar 2013 14:50:28 GMT

Here's a good timeline of the stages of the ProV1.

Re: Pro V1 392

Francisco Z — Fri, 01 Mar 2013 12:44:33 GMT

Can we get pictures of the markings of these different balls?

Re: Pro V1 392

Michael W — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:44:07 GMT

Received the following response from Titleist. Beware of "new in box sales" on ebay or other sites:

QUESTION:
What year are Pro V1 balls that have ''Pro V1 - 392'' imprinted on the
side? How old are these balls?Thanks

ANSWER:
Thank you for your question regarding Titleist golf balls. Below is a list
of side-stamps that would designate the order-of-release starting with the
original version:

PRO V1 392 ... 2000 - January 2001
< PRO V1 . 392 > ... February 2001 - January 2003
< . PRO V1 392 . > ... February 2003 - January 2005
< PRO V1 - 392 > ... February 2005 - January 2007
<----- Pro V1 -----> ... February 2007 - January 2009
< . ----- Pro V1 ----- . > ... February 2009 - present

We also released the Pro V1 Star and X which have the following
side-stamps in the order-of-release:

< Pro V1 * 392 > ... February 2001 - January 2003
< . Pro V1x 332 . > ... February 2003 - January 2005
< Pro V1x - 332 > ... February 2005 - January 2007
<----- Pro V1x ------> February 2007 - January 2009
< . ----- Pro V1x ----- . > ... February 2009 - present

Thank you for your continued support of Titleist...the #1 Ball in Golf.