<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.titleist.com/teamtitleist/utility/feedstylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Spine alignment vs Pureing</title><link>https://www.titleist.com/teamtitleist/team-titleist/f/club-fitting/20103/spine-alignment-vs-pureing</link><description> Team Titleist, 
 Spine alignment has been around for some time when fitted for shafts using the traditional bearing spine alignment tools. The latest method is done by pureing on a computerized pureing machine to pinpoint the spline of shafts so they</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 10</generator><item><title>Re: Spine alignment vs Pureing</title><link>https://www.titleist.com/teamtitleist/thread/88390?ContentTypeID=1</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:24:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9ab519fc-5311-4952-85cd-0a0ceffb73fb:85dd1f6e-9865-4e72-a771-d080e69bff50</guid><dc:creator>eboos</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If I understand correctly, spine alignment is just to eliminate inconsistancies due to the shafts spine orientation in the clubhead. It shouldn&amp;#39;t affect kick point, launch angle of torque of the shaft but make the clubs more consistant from club to club. In essence, it should make the shafts perform as they should in a more controlled set of circumstances.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>