Forget Swing Speed

Follow Thread

By Stephan T

  • 0 Likes
  • 2 Replies
  1. Stephan T

    Stephan T
    Centennial, CO

    I'm reading about an increasing number of players who are still confused about golf ball selection. "I can't compress a Pro V1" or "I don't have the swing speed for a Pro V1x."

    Forget swing speed as a way to select a golf ball. There are really only two types of golf balls - those covered with Urethane (that spin more) and those covered with Surlyn (that spin less). When they were introduced in the early 1970's, Surlyn covered golf balls were marketed correctly as balls that would not cut - as opposed to Balata covered balls. Some of you may remember teeing off with a DT Titleist (less spin, more durable) and then replacing it with a Titleist Balata ball (more spin) for your approach shot. 

    Around the turn of the century, golf ball manufacturers were trying to find a ball that would perform like Balata around the green and be straighter and more durable off the tee. When those balls finally arrived on the market they were three-piece urethane covered balls. Remember cally Rule 35? One version was marketed as firm feel (red dot) and the other was marketed as soft feel (blue dot.) Other manufacturers followed but none marketed their balls with swing speed as a selection tool.

    If you were the #2 or #3 golf ball manufacturer and you wanted to sell golf balls you would need a hook - a reason with the veneer of truth to convince players to try your product. Enter swing speed. But I believe Fordie Pitts provides the absolute best advice when he recommends that you find a ball that performs for you around the green with your wedges and short irons and then fit your driver to that ball. 

  2. Dino J

    Dino J
    Burnaby, BC

    Ahh Stephen ... nice post... you reminded me of how much I loved my balata balls for shots to and around the green ... including putting. It was like putting a marshmallow! But, I loved the feel! What you omitted though, was that swing speed was a factor in those days in terms of choosing and fitting golf balls. If you recall, most of the balls played were wound construction with their compression marked on the ball covers. E.g.; Titleist DT 90, DT 80, DT 100 , etc. Golf pro's (as Pro Shops tended to be the main source of equipment sales in those days) overwhelmingly fitted to swing speed via ball compression. The main difference between now and then, is that swing speed is much more actively marketed today by the printing on the sleeves, boxes, marketing campaigns, etc. HOWEVER, I think the main point of your comment is very relevant and that is that today's balls with multi-piece balls and urethane covers help provide golfers with the best of both worlds ... distance, durable covers with great control around the greens.
  3. No'l

    No'l
    Palmdale, CA

    The Balata ball was nice. I was too new in golf then, and I was only able to play them a few times. In early 2000, I started playing the Pro V1. Anyway, great post and a good look/way at a ball fitting. For me, I favor the ProV1 more than the x, but I play them both. This video shows why: http://www.titleist.com/golf-balls/Pro-V1-Pro-V1x.aspx#TotalPerformance

Please login to post a comment.

Sign In

Haven't registered for Team Titleist yet?

Sign Up