Facebook Twitter
Posted: April 12, 2007
Zach reacts to his chip on the final hole Sunday at Augusta National.
Next Post
Are there any plans to release a new Vokey Design wedge in the near future?
JET wrote on April 13, 2007 at 11:04PM
What is the lifespan of a Spin Milled wedge? At what point do the grooves lose optimum performance, with average use? Thanks.
JET wrote on April 14, 2007 at 12:04PM
To what extent does the dirt in the grooves of a wedge, particularly the Spin Milled wedges, affect its performance? Should I be concerned with completely removing the dirt within the grooves of the club before each shot? If so, does Titleist recommend a method, or have a product, for cleaning the club's grooves? How do Tour players handle this issue?
JET wrote on April 14, 2007 at 2:04PM
Any debris stuck in a club's grooves reduces the effective volume of those grooves and, in turn, reduces the grooves' ability to perform the task for which they are designed. For maximum effectiveness, grooves should be cleared of debris after every shot. Tour players generally rely on a caddie with a wet towel to perform this task.
JET wrote on April 16, 2007 at 4:04PM
We are always working on new designs and testing them with the Tour pros. While we are currently working on a number of new grinds, we have no plans to introduce any of these models this year.
The lifespan of any club depends on a number of factors. Each player needs to individually decide when a particular club no longer performs to their expectations, and replace as necessary.
JET wrote on April 16, 2007 at 7:04PM
It looks like a number of Tour players have wedge combos of 54° and 60°. If a player was more of a "slider", I'm curious as to which wedge they'd predominantly use for greenside bunker shots (if they had 54.10 and 60.04 wedges)?
Cheers!
JET wrote on April 17, 2007 at 3:04AM
There is a lot of talk about the benefits of cavity back irons and their wide use on Tour. But, isn't it true that blades, particularly the 695MB, offer more workability than any of the cavity back irons? If so, why are Titleist Tour players, like Zach, using CB irons instead of MBs. Aside from personal preference, is there objective basis for CBs over MBs? Is it a misconception that CBs are not as workable as MBs?
Thanks!
JET wrote on April 17, 2007 at 2:04PM
This would likely depend on the firmness of the sand as well as the length of the shot.
JET wrote on April 17, 2007 at 4:04PM
Cavity back design in irons has more to do with playability than workability. Weight redistribution in cavity back irons allows for an increase in the club's moment-of-inertia (MOI) as well as for repositioning of the club's center of gravity (CG). This translates into greater forgiveness on off-center impacts and optimized launch conditions with controllable ball flights.
JET wrote on April 17, 2007 at 5:04PM
What is the MOI of the 907D1 and the 907D2? I bought the 907D2 and wanted to know the difference.
JET wrote on August 9, 2007 at 12:08AM
The <a href="www.titleist.com/.../907D1.asp" rel="nofollow">907D1</a> has a heel-toe MOI that is about 11% greater and a high-low MOI that is about 15% greater than the <a href="www.titleist.com/.../907D2.asp" rel="nofollow">907D2</a>.
JET wrote on August 9, 2007 at 4:08PM
Are there any plans to release new drivers in the near future? I had heard rumors of a carbon-composite 905R being Tour tested. Thanks!
JET wrote on November 2, 2007 at 4:11AM
We do not comment on future product launch plans on this blog.
JET wrote on November 2, 2007 at 3:11PM